Art of Deception: Training for a New Generation of Online Covert
A perfect example of a shill is Hama Neggs in the comment section
of the video entitled, "USAF
Environmental Specialist Kristen Meghan | Blows Whistle On Air
Force | Chemtrail Chemicals". I wanted to make
a screen capture of his/her comments, but there are too many to
fit onto one page. I've embedded this vid into the home page of
this site and have checked the vid intermittently. Every time I
have, Hama Neggs comments dominated the comments section. This
person has been under this vid many times a day, almost every
day since the time the vid came out a few months ago and he/she
responds to people who are not even replying to him. He/she receives
notification of any activity under that video or he has the page
opened on one of a few computer monitors each day. Of course his
getting notification or having a few computers is only speculation,
but his persistently responding quickly to my own comments when
not addressing him (which he would not get in his inbox); indicates
Note: I have since replaced on my home page the embedded vid that is linked above with another
of the same, but from a different Youtube channel. This link still works here, just no longer
embedded on the home page. It's been 6 months since the vid was originally uploaded and still
Hama Neggs is dominating the comments and I am thinking he/she will never leave that page. Now,
this is what I would call a full-time job.
Note: The above was written about two years ago. Hama Neggs might
have since been replaced by someone else, especially since I called him/her out. I know this
page was shown to Mick West, the owner of two debunking sites. I know this because I once saw
that a commentor shared this page in a comment under one of his posts.
Ex-CBS Reporter: DC Co-Opting Social Media with
Fake Accounts to Sway Public Opinion
MY RESPONSE TO A COMMON SHILL STATEMENT:
"You're not an atmospheric scientist".
I do not have to be an atmospheric scientist to know when a cloud is fake anymore
than I have to be a horticulturist to know when a plant is fake. Nor do I have to be a graduate
of husbandry to know when an animal is a result of cross breeding.
One does not have to be a graduate of a university to have eyes and common sense.
These debunkers try to lay the standard of what is considered “legitimate”
observation and by doing so, try to lead others toward a standard by which to judge. I don't
need them to give me THEIR standards to be able to tell the difference between natural and
unnatural. Nor, do I have need to have degrees to be able to see and use common sense.
RESPONSE TO ANOTHER COMMON SHILL STATEMENT:
"There are more lines in the sky because there are more jets"
One of the "debunking lines" so called debunkers like to use to convince others
that chemtrails are contrails is "there are more lines because there are more planes". More
planes than when?!! The 1980's when we still had blue sky and the economy was better? or are
they comparing with the 18 or 1900's? and why were there not some lines, but fewer before the
We have more unemployment, homelessness and a few airlines went out of business since the 1980's
when the skies were still blue. So, how could there possibly be more passenger jets in the sky
now than before? The answer is that they are not passenger jets we are seeing flying low enough
to be audible inside our house. The increase in air traffic is due to military tanker jets
spraying aerosols of different mixtures.
Get it yet? With higher unemployment rates, higher costs of flying, airlines out of business and
more homelessness; we don't have more passenger planes now than we had before, but less.
Those who call themselves "debunkers" do not deserve that title as one has to actually debunk
successfully to be able to take claim to being a debunker.